[Fwd: ATTN: Please comment on XHTML (before it's too late)]

[Ann Navarro]

At 10:26 AM 8/29/99 -0400, Ann Navarro wrote:

>No, we've not confused them. We happen to have three 'flavors' of XHTML 
>1.0 (the first deliverable from the XHTML project, not the end sum of our 
>work), that essentially map to the three flavors of HTML 4.0. Each of them 
>was assigned a namespace that corresponds in title to the three flavor 
>names. We do not mistakenly confuse their DTDs for their namespaces. (nor 
>are we limiting XHTML to the use of DTDs, Schemas, as has been pointed 
>out, 'isn't soup yet')

I should clarify myself here. Yes, the XHTML 1.0 PR does say a conforming 
document must validate against one of the three DTDs.

I certainly recognize that schemas or other defining mechanisms may also 
play into our future work.

Ann

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)