[Fwd: ATTN: Please comment on XHTML (before it's too late)]
ann at webgeek.com
Sun Aug 29 19:30:56 BST 1999
At 06:41 PM 8/29/99 +0100, W. Eliot Kimber wrote:
> > No, we've not confused them. We happen to have three 'flavors' of XHTML 1.0
> > (the first deliverable from the XHTML project, not the end sum of our
> > work), that essentially map to the three flavors of HTML 4.0. Each of them
> > was assigned a namespace that corresponds in title to the three flavor
> > names. We do not mistakenly confuse their DTDs for their namespaces. (nor
> > are we limiting XHTML to the use of DTDs, Schemas, as has been pointed out,
> > 'isn't soup yet')
>But: name spaces do not define anything. Therefore, a namespace cannot
>be the *definition* of what these three flavors are.
I didn't say they did define anything. I said they each have a namespace.
Period. They each have a DTD. Period.
They happen to share a string for a portion of their titles.
That does not say "the namespace defines the flavors".
Author: Effective Web Design: Master the Essentials
Buy it Online! http://www.webgeek.com/about.html
Owner, WebGeek Communications http://www.webgeek.com
Vice President, HTML Writers Guild http://www.hwg.org
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev