ATTN: Please comment on XHTML (before it's too late)

[Ann Navarro]

At 02:43 PM 8/29/99 -0400, David Megginson wrote:

>(and I think that Tim's throw-away number was, if anything, a gross
>underestimate -- I cannot imagine even 1 in 1000 processes caring
>about the difference between transitional and strict)

<snip>

>You and I, Paul have seen too many worthy specs fail completely
>because of superfluous complexity -- HyTime, Topic Maps, and DSSSL
>(and Architectural Forms) spring immediately to mind, but they hardly
>stand alone.  Most specs fail anyway, complex or not (XML's success is
>the exception rather than the rule), but it would be nice to give
>XHTML at least a fighting chance.

David,

Did HTML 4.0 -- with it's three versions, fail from overcomplexity?

Ann
---
Ann Navarro
Author: Effective Web Design: Master the Essentials
Buy it Online!    http://www.webgeek.com/about.html
Owner, WebGeek Communications   http://www.webgeek.com
Vice President, HTML Writers Guild   http://www.hwg.org

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)