How do you determine success?
ann at webgeek.com
Sun Aug 29 22:09:48 BST 1999
At 03:55 PM 8/29/99 -0400, David Megginson wrote:
>Ann Navarro writes:
> > Did HTML 4.0 -- with it's three versions, fail from overcomplexity?
>Sorry to be harsh, but I almost never see the required HTML 4.0
>DOCTYPE declaration at the top of Web pages and I know of no
>widely-deployed HTML user agent that actually tries to distinguish
>HTML 4.0 from HTML 3.* and do something useful based on that
>distinction (much less one that distinguishes the transitional and
Is that not, then, a failure of the user agent and not the spec?
If a user agent ignores something *required* - we can't save them from
Indeed, because of this failure in user agents, combined with other
tendencies of sub-par support for specs, the HTML-using world is becoming
more aware of the need for DTDs and validation. Valid HTML documents have a
better chance of displaying cross-browser and cross-platform as the author
intended. Invalid ones are a crap-shoot.
But none of this is an indication that we need to take HTML 4.0 out back
and shoot it.
Author: Effective Web Design: Master the Essentials
Buy it Online! http://www.webgeek.com/about.html
Owner, WebGeek Communications http://www.webgeek.com
Vice President, HTML Writers Guild http://www.hwg.org
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev