ATTN: Please comment on XHTML (before it's too late)
ann at webgeek.com
Mon Aug 30 00:53:56 BST 1999
At 03:46 PM 8/29/99 -0700, Tim Bray wrote:
>The gripe is with this silly 3-namespace notion, which materially decreases
>the utility of XHTML and establishes a violently dangerous precedent.
There's where we disagree.
I *could* go either way on the namespaces personally. Some very persuasive
arguments brought me (and the group) back around to three.
I think it's a bit melodramatic, however, to categorize this issue as a
"violently dangerous precedent".
Author: Effective Web Design: Master the Essentials
Buy it Online! http://www.webgeek.com/about.html
Owner, WebGeek Communications http://www.webgeek.com
Vice President, HTML Writers Guild http://www.hwg.org
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev