ATTN: Please comment on XHTML (before it's too late)

[Don Park]

>I seem to have 14,000 messages about this already.
>
>Are the right people lietening?  I.e., is the discussion being heard
>by the people developing XHTML?

This is an important issue that affects everyone working with XHTML so it
deserves further discussion.

Personally, I am for having only one namespace for XHTML for two reasons:

1. Less headaches for me.
2. Less headaches for my customers.

Namespace is just a scheme for sorting out the names regardless of how the
names are used.  I would like to see just one namespace for all three
variations and future versions of XHTML.  It is true that semantics of these
tags might be changed in the future but that is just plain bad engineering
from my point of view and should never happen.

Replying

Don Park    -   mailto:donpark at docuverse.com
Docuverse   -   http://www.docuverse.com


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)