why distinctions within XHTML?

[Ann Navarro]

At 02:05 PM 8/30/99 -0400, Simon St.Laurent wrote:

>Assuming that the WG has a clear, though unstated, roadmap for integrating
>its usage of namespaces with future XML schema developments seems like a
>very bad idea indeed.

Wait a minute, nobody has said that. How does the HTML WG have the power to
"integrate" it's uage of namespaces with someone else's work product? 

This is where assumptions lead to alot of misinformation and assertions
that the sky is falling. 

We can certainly sit here and poke sticks at the process, but it's what we
have to work with right now. Within this process, it is a given that
non-participants and non-member-employee individuals won't have direct
access to the drafts that haven't yet been made public. I don't think we're
really here to argue the appropriateness of that right now. 

But that lag in information dissemination shouldn't be a platform for leaps
in assumption either. The people working on these things aren't stupid --
nor are they unaware of conversations like this one, in this forum and in
many others. 

Ann


---

Author of Effective Web Design: Master the Essentials
Coming in September --- Mastering XML

Founder, WebGeek Communications            http://www.webgeek.com
Vice President-Finance, HTML Writers Guild http://www.hwg.org
Director, HWG Online Education             http://www.hwg.org/services/classes





xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)