why distinctions within XHTML?
david-b at pacbell.net
Tue Aug 31 18:16:26 BST 1999
Ann Navarro wrote:
> At 08:53 AM 8/31/99 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> >One doesn't need to be a conspiracy theorist to identify real flaws
> >in how the W3C does its business. As a steward of an international
> >resource, it should be as accountable to customers as to vendors.
> And I'm trying to point out it is.
That issue is well recognized on XML-DEV. This XHTML debate is
> The membership is not solely made up of
> vendors. :)
It's hard to see the evidence of that in the actions taken.
Rushing "specifications" out before there's real consensus
in the industry (including customers!) on them is only of
benefit to suppliers ("first to market" advantage).
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev