tbray at textuality.com
Wed Dec 1 23:45:32 GMT 1999
At 02:02 PM 12/1/99 -0800, Walter Underwood wrote:
>I disagree on this one. It's rare that metacontent is more
>valuable than content, long-term. I'll bet on the books over
>the card catalog, every time.
Wow, that's a profoundly deep and strong statement, and I think at the
core of the argument that *should* be happening about how to make the
Web a better place. In fairness, it should be said that Walter works for
a company whose search engine does the equivalent of reading all the
pages of all the books on all the shelves, and trying to guess what the
books mean. I used to be in that business myself.
But I think metadata wins. If you count hits on Internet search engines,
the Yahoo and ODP directories, which are both human-constructed metadata,
absolutely wipe out any fulltext search engine you can name, even though
they have orders of magnitude less sites and a lower volume of information
about each. Because human-constructed metadata wins on the net just like
it did in the library.
RDF is important because it can facilitate the interchange of, and
a certain number of the common uses of, this kind of metadata.
Anyhow, just because you have a card catalogue doesn't mean you throw
the library books away. -Tim
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev