Some Questions

[David Megginson]

"Jeffrey E. Sussna" <jes at kuantech.com> writes:

> I think the important thing to remember about RDF is that it is not XML. It
> is fundamentally an abstract model for expressing metadata. It happens to be
> representable using XML, but it is different from XML. Unfortunately, this
> distinction is part of what makes the spec hard to read, but it's important.

That's a good point, and it's important to remember that it applies to
almost *everything* that can be represented in XML.  Even traditional
document types like HTML or DocBook really have their own model (hence
the HTML DOM).


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david at megginson.com
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)