SAX/C++: First interface draft

[Larry Watanabe]

	I would suggest making the String class external, with a
well-defined minimal interface. Then the user could implement the interface
in their own string classes, typedef the String (or DOMString or whatever)
as their class, and compile it together. 

	This would allow an application to use its own String
implementation, which would save the trouble of a lot of conversions. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	David Megginson [SMTP:david at megginson.com]
> Sent:	Thursday, December 02, 1999 4:40 PM
> To:	XMLDev list
> Subject:	SAX/C++: First interface draft
> 
> I have just drafted this interface, and haven't even run it through a
> C++ compiler yet.  For clarity, I've omitted constructors and
> destructors, as well as most of what will be inline implementations.
> 
> Notes: I haven't looked at other C++ efforts yet, but I will try to do
> so now.  Eventually, this should be in a special C++ namespace.
> 
> 

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)