Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++
jjc at jclark.com
Fri Dec 3 07:34:28 GMT 1999
"Thomas B. Passin" wrote:
> David Megginson wrote
> > Tim Bray writes:
> > > At 04:27 PM 12/2/99 -0500, David Megginson wrote:
> > > >I'll be posting three follow-up messages on SAX/C++ to stimulate
> > > >discussion:
> > >
> > > Good idea, one question. Any way to do C at the same time? -Tim
> > Sure -- is there a strong need for a common C interface, though? We
> > already have Expat's C interface, and I don't know of anyone else in
> > that space yet.
> But C is available on most _any_ platform - often for free.
So is C++ these days.
> So almost
> anyone could compile in C but not necessarily in C++.
The bigger problem is that the SAX style of interface goes over quite
naturally into C++, but would be rather awkward in C.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev