SAX/C++: First interface draft

[Steinar Bang]

>>>>> James Clark <jjc at jclark.com>:

> - Would it be better to typedef SAXString to the Standard C++ string
> class (ie std::basic_string<SAXChar>)?

An argument for using 
        typdef const SAXChar* SAXString;
is that you get late construction of the basic_string<>, ie. you don't 
create it until you have to (eg. when using it to do a lookup in an
STL map<>).

But ven if it's not used directly on the SAX interface, such a typedef
would be useful when handling the data (eg. for creating the above
mentioned map<>).

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)