SGML the next big thing?

[Arnold, Curt]

Erlend Xverby [Erlend.Overby at usit.uio.no] wrote

>>What we don't need from the SGML standard:
>> - SGML Declaration
>> - Character entities
>> - Minimisation
>> - The "&" construct

It looks like the XML Schema group is trying to add back the & construct.
If you have a compelling justification for continued suppression, please
rant long and loud.

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)