SAX/C++ vs. SAX2

[Tim Bray]

At 01:21 PM 12/3/99 -0500, David Megginson wrote:
>1. To get some kind of standard Namespace support (or at least a way
>   to tell whether a parser has Namespace support built in).
>2. To query parser features in general.
>3. To get at the stuff that SAX 1.0 doesn't report, like comments,
>   CDATA boundaries, and DTD declarations.
>
>I think that there is a real need for #1
>I think that #2 would make life a fair bit easier for library developers
>I have a lot of trouble with #3

Agreed, on all points.  The unavailability of namespaces threatens
to make SAX unusable before too long. -Tim

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)