SAX/C++ vs. SAX2
Sebastien Sahuc
ssahuc at imediation.com
Mon Dec 6 09:03:42 GMT 1999
> Michael Fuller wrote :
> But having taken a look at SAX2, not much seems to be wrong with it.
> *That* trend needs to be stepped on, and quickly, before it
> gets out of hand.
Completely agree with it. And why not focus on SAX2 for both Java and
C++ as someone has already pointed out ?
Sebastien
>
> Michael
> ____________________________________________
> http://www.mds.rmit.edu.au/~msf/
> Multimedia Databases Group, RMIT, Australia.
>
> xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post,
> mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
> Archived as:
> http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on
> CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
> To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
> unsubscribe xml-dev
> To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the
> following message;
> subscribe xml-dev-digest
> List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
>
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev
mailing list