SAX/C++ vs. SAX2

[Lars Marius Garshol]

* David Megginson
|
| I'd like to hear what others think on this issue.

My feeling is that SAX2 is very important (namespaces, generalized
querying and extensibility and lexical information are all very
important to some kinds of applications), and furthermore so close to
completion that it should go before a C++ binding, which might take a
long time to complete.

The added benefit is of course that the C++ bindings for SAX 1.0 and
2.0 can be done simultaneously.

--Lars M.

 


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)