Request for Discussion: SAX 1.0 in C++

[David Megginson]

roddey at us.ibm.com writes:

> 11) The class names (since we can't afford to use C++ namespaces) should be
> expanded to include a SAX prefix to avoid clashes. So SAXParser and
> SAXLocator and SAXAttributeList and so on.

Is it true that C++ namespaces are still a problem on any platform?  I
know that they actually do work under Windows, and the newer EGCS/GCC
have supported them for a while for all *nix variants (including
Linux) -- is it the Mac that doesn't have a proper C++ compiler yet?


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david at megginson.com
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)