What is the reasoning why a well-formed XML text cannot have multiple
top level elements?
Clark C. Evans
clark.evans at manhattanproject.com
Mon Dec 20 03:16:06 GMT 1999
I guess the title says it all.
It just seems that two domains, log files and continuous
broadcasts are left out in the cold with this seemingly
arbitrary choice. So, I'm looking for answers *other*
than the following:
0. Beacuse the spec says so.
1. To stay compatible with SGML, so XML documents
can be used in SGML processors.
3. Beacuse XML is syntax for *documents* ; it was
never intended to be a general *information* syntax.
P.S. Yes, I'm familar with the Document Fragment NOTE, this
is exactly why I'm asking the question.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev