SAX2: Namespace proposal

Tim Bray tbray at
Mon Dec 20 16:45:47 GMT 1999

At 08:21 AM 12/20/99 -0500, David Megginson wrote:
>> - a pure namespaces view
>> - a simultaneous namespaces and XML 1.0 view
>> - a pure XML 1.0 view
>I agree -- I think that this is the cleanest approach.

I have a great deal of trouble imagining a situation in which the 
"simultaneous" view is desirable or even safe.  Could someone help out
with a use-case please?

If I'm right, then given that SAX1 already does the pure XML1.0 view, why do 
we need more than one view? -Tim

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at
Archived as: and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at

More information about the Xml-dev mailing list