SAX2: Should SAXException extend IOException?

[David Megginson]

Rajiv Mordani writes:

 > I am not sure what the intent is of having IOException. I think
 > SAXException seems appropriate to me..

I'd like to hear as many opinions on this point as possible.  What is
the rationale for *not* deriving SAXException from IOException when
(for example) java.net.MalformedURLException and
java.util.zip.ZipException are derived from IOException?

I especially like the idea that higher-level libraries could have

  void importXML (String uri) throws IOException;

without the application's having any direct dependency on SAX
interfaces.  It could accomplish the same thing by having a
SAXExceptionAdapter that embeds the SAXException and extends
IOException, but that seems like a lot of unnecessary fuss for a very
common case.

Opinions?


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david at megginson.com
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)