SAX2: DeclHandler

Richard Anderson rja at
Thu Dec 23 13:46:49 GMT 1999

> > > We could still have the callbacks throw SAXException, if that's what
> > > people prefer.
> >
> > Yes Please.  Exception really dont work well in VB and several other
> > langauges.
> I'm not quite sure I understand -- if exceptions don't work well in a
> language, then neither a general IOException nor a specific
> SAXException would be appropriate.

Provided we just have a class that represents an exception, which is passed
via a callback and doesnt depend on the usual java/C++ throw() mechanisms
I'll be happy.

Also, if we dont derive any of the SAX interfaces from anything that isnt
available in all langauges, I'll be even happlier.



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at
Archived as: and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at

More information about the Xml-dev mailing list