Why not PIs for namespace declarations?
simonstl at simonstl.com
Thu Dec 23 19:42:30 GMT 1999
At 02:17 PM 12/23/99 -0500, David Megginson wrote:
>There are a lot of answers to this question, but in the end, the real
>argument was that PIs cause display problems in level-3 and level-4
>HTML browsers, and some influential parties  had a strong interest
>in being able to write HTML+XML documents that, by various sorts of
>lexical trickery, could still be displayed in XML-oblivious browsers
>like Netscape 3.
>Yes, I know everything you're going to say, and I probably agree with
>all of it. I've written a couple of Namespace filters, and they'd be
>*much* easier if all Namespace declarations appeared in the prolog.
And here I thought it was that processing instructions give the W3C a
mysterious rash. Good to know, though!
Happy Holidays, all!
XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed.
Building XML Applications
Inside XML DTDs: Scientific and Technical
Sharing Bandwidth / Cookies
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev