No Standard way to reference XML Schema? Was Re: (Many)
XML Schema Questions
simonstl at simonstl.com
Thu Dec 30 14:47:32 GMT 1999
At 01:26 PM 12/30/99 +0000, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
>A moment's thought about experience with XML's instance->DTD linkage
>will perhaps suggest some benefits of this approach: as it stands, if
>I wish to validate an XML instance which references no external DTD, I
>have to edit it to incorporate a suitable DOCTYPE declaration. Even
>if the document has a DOCTYPE, if the URL it references is unavailable
>or out-of-date, I again must have recourse to a text editor to fix
>this. We've tried to do better for XML Schema. Another experience
>we've tried to learn from is the instance->stylesheet one, with
>similar lessons we believe.
As glad as I am to see the Schema folks wrestling with these issues, it
seems like they belong someplace else - with the instance->stylesheet
Has anything ever come of the 'plans for a Working Group on XML Packaging'
mentioned in the XML Activity Statement
(http://www.w3.org/XML/Activity.html), or is this just too dull for
people/companies to get excited about?
These issues are pretty much at the core of XML processing, and not just
XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed.
Building XML Applications
Inside XML DTDs: Scientific and Technical
Cookies / Sharing Bandwidth
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev