Compound Documents - necessary for success?

[james anderson]

Ronald Bourret wrote:
> 
> Nope -- no ignorance at all.  This is very definitely the problem
> namespaces were meant to address.  It's just that the original reaction of
> many people to the namespaces spec is that it somehow solves the "automagic
> combination" and "'valid' against multiple DTDs" problems as well.  (Put
> another way, you can get lunch, but it's not free.)

how about this for a synopsys: it guarantees you your own seat at the bar, but
you still going to have to be old enough to drink.


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)