Interesting Monday.

[Paul Prescod]

"Matthew Sergeant (EML)" wrote:
> 

>         Nonononono. :)
> 
>         This generates probably 5% more overhead than I have already (the
> RDBMS). XML doesn't parse quickly (well, OK, it parses quickly, but not
> compared to reading data from an RDBMS). When you are processing tens of XML
> files per second this becomes a huge problem.

You could build a parse tree in a "servlet" and hand it right to an XSL
stylesheet. The benefit of this is that you have the modularization of
having style application be independent of your database structure but you
don't actually create a file, start another process, parse the file and
continue.

 Paul Prescod  - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself
 http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco

"Remember, Ginger Rogers did everything that Fred Astaire did,
but she did it backwards and in high heels."
                                               --Faith Whittlesey

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)