A weaker XSL?
peter at weblogic.com
Thu Feb 4 16:08:50 GMT 1999
At 05:17 AM 2/4/99 , Michael.Kay at icl.com wrote:
>> Is there a possibility for creating a sub-set of
>> XSL that would work on a stream instead of
>> requiring a complete document object?
>Funny you should ask that, I've been experimenting over the last few days to
>see whether I could build such a thing on top of SAXON. Not actually easy to
>do as a pure subset, but I think one can do something that feels quite
So I obviously lack imagination or understanding of all the intricacies of
XSL -- what can you express in XSL that you couldn't implement on top of SAX?
Peter Seibel Perl/Java/English Hacker peter at weblogic.com
Is Windows98 Y2K compliant?
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev