A weaker XSL?

[Peter Seibel]

At 05:17 AM 2/4/99 , Michael.Kay at icl.com wrote:
>> Is there a possibility for creating a sub-set of 
>> XSL that would work on a stream instead of 
>> requiring a complete document object?
>
>Funny you should ask that, I've been experimenting over the last few days to
>see whether I could build such a thing on top of SAXON. Not actually easy to
>do as a pure subset, but I think one can do something that feels quite
>XSL-like.

So I obviously lack imagination or understanding of all the intricacies of
XSL -- what can you express in XSL that you couldn't implement on top of SAX?

-Peter

-- 
Peter Seibel          Perl/Java/English Hacker      peter at weblogic.com

                     Is Windows98 Y2K compliant? 



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)