Component Markup Language

Matthew Sergeant (EML) Matthew.Sergeant at
Thu Feb 4 17:20:12 GMT 1999

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Mark Birbeck [SMTP:Mark.Birbeck at]
> Great idea. Can I suggest we call it HTML?
> (OK I know I've cracked that one already - it's the end of the week. But
> really, if you want an XML specification for a user interface, surely
> HTML 4.0 is the one to choose. Then you could use a 'cool browser' that
> has an "XML GUI Interpreter" built in - like, well, IE4 and Netscape 4.)
HTML 4 isn't quite up to providing a full GUI, even with the DOM. For
example you can't do menu's. You can't do buttons with images on them (I'm
not talking about images that are buttons), you can't do tabbed dialogs
(well, you can, but it's non-trivial), I'm sure there are other things. Of
course you could add these things into HTML 5, but I don't think it's worth
going down that road.

Perl on Win32, PerlScript, ASP, Database, XML
GCS(GAT) d+ s:+ a-- C++ UL++>UL+++$ P++++$ E- W+++ N++ w--@$ O- M-- !V 
!PS !PE Y+ PGP- t+ 5 R tv+ X++ b+ DI++ D G-- e++ h--->z+++ R+++

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at
Archived as: and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at

More information about the Xml-dev mailing list