Clear specs: suggestions
John E. Simpson
simpson at polaris.net
Mon Feb 8 17:00:54 GMT 1999
At 11:29 AM 2/8/99 -0500, Frank Boumphrey wrote:
><<(2) Establish editorial-review committees at least at the level of the
>W3C's four "domains":>>
>I think we need to distinguish between authors, technical editors, and
That's a good distinction to make.
>Usually a committee is a complete disaster for the last group, and produces
>the kind of compromised documents that we have been complaining of.
"Committee" really wasn't a good word choice. (Sheesh, where's an editor
when I need one...?) What I'm thinking of is actually more like a *pool* of
individuals for each of the problem domains/activities who could be drawn
upon, one for each spec, to clarify and smooth out the rough-hewn bits in
John E. Simpson | It's no disgrace t'be poor,
simpson at polaris.net | but it might as well be.
| -- "Kin" Hubbard
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev