Fw: DOM vs. SAX??? Nah. (was RE: Storing Lots of Fiddly Bits (was Re: What is XML for?)
cowan at locke.ccil.org
Thu Feb 11 18:15:40 GMT 1999
Oren Ben-Kiki wrote:
> DOM specs should provide a standard way to apply a SAX visitor to a DOM
> (sub)tree. A parser would be just a special case of an application which has
> an internal "virtual DOM tree" and doesn't provide random access to it.
See http://www.ccil.org/~cowan/XML/DOMParser.java for code that does
just this: it walks a org.w3c.dom.Document and fires SAX events
based on its contents.
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan at ccil.org
You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn.
You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn.
Clear all so! 'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev