Confusion about conditional sections

roddey at us.ibm.com roddey at us.ibm.com
Mon Feb 22 18:26:58 GMT 1999




>I'd say you MUST do this.
>
>Consider this sort of structure, which I found in a version of
>the XML Docbook DTD:
>
>    <![ %TOGGLE1; [
>         <!ENTITY % something "contents">
>    ]]>
>    <![ %TOGGLE2; [
>         <!ELEMENT %something; ANY>
>    ]]>
>
>That is, if you tried to parse the contents of the second conditional
>section and something like the first one hadn't been parsed, you would
>be in undeserved trouble.

That makes sense, yes. I guess that's argument enough that it's the only
way to do it.



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)




More information about the Xml-dev mailing list