Streaming XML (Was RE: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C
Mark.Birbeck at iedigital.net
Tue Feb 23 18:10:21 GMT 1999
len bullard wrote:
> Mark Birbeck wrote:
> > A consistent theme in this discussion forum is that people
> always want
> > every major breakthrough that has been made by XML to be
> removed, under
> > the pretence of coping with some 'special circumstances'.
> If you think
> > about it, it is quite unique in the history of software
> engineering to
> > have an agreed standard which allows us to check whether a
> document that
> > we had no part in designing the layout for, is valid.
> Not to be tendentious, but some of us having been doing that for at
> least a generation now. SGML works.
Hello Len, I was using my words carefully! SGML has of course been
around for a while, and been very important for document management and
generation. But in the world of software engineering we are constantly
reinventing the wheel; coming up with new file formats, parsers,
transmission mechanisms, and so on. So, in the world I'm in, XML *is* a
unique and unprecedented contribution.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev