Internationalization and naming
cowan at locke.ccil.org
Tue Jan 5 17:52:57 GMT 1999
Simon St.Laurent wrote:
> [In] XML [...] you can name your elements and attributes whatever
> you like - but it seems likely to crop up again any time people and
> organizations go to build document standards using XML.
> Will English vocabularies be used, or will other languages be used? [...]
> This seems like something that the next generation of schemas could address
> neatly, by providing room for something like a translation table,
> identifying elements and their 'standard' equivalents.
This strikes me as an ideal application of architectural forms
(as implemented in XAF: see http://www.megginson.com/XAF).
By specifying the desired standard form as an architecture,
you allow the element types to be locally meaningful, while
letting applications (XSL, validation, or whatever) to act)
on architectural element types. XAF does the donkey work of
reducing one to the other.
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan at ccil.org
You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn.
You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn.
Clear all so! 'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev