Just a doubt...
rbourret at ito.tu-darmstadt.de
Thu Jan 7 09:39:35 GMT 1999
Cesar Bonavides M. wrote:
> To make it simple:
> I already read the XML, XLink, XPointer and XSL stuff, but that thing
> about XML-data and XML-schemas really did confuse me.
Currently, the legal format of an XML file is defined in a DTD. For
example, the following DTD defines XML documents in which a Memo element
contains one or more Paragraph elements and a Paragraph element contains
parsed character data:
<!ELEMENT Memo (Paragraph+)>
<!ELEMENT Paragraph (#PCDATA)>
XML schema languages are an attempt to replace DTDs. That is, they are XML
languages used to defined other XML languages. For example, the DTD shown
above can be defined in XML-Data as:
<element type="#Paragraph" occurs="ONEORMORE"/>
There are two main reasons to do this. The first reason is that DTDs are
restricted by the XML 1.0 requirement that XML be compatible with SGML.
Thus, DTDs cannot be extended in ways that are incompatible with SGML
DTDs. However, schema languages are not restricted and can therefore be
extended in new ways, such as data typing of elements.
The second reason is more practical in nature. Because many people write
XML documents but few people write XML DTDs, many more tools and
technologies are available for XML documents than for XML DTDs. Because
schema languages use XML document syntax, they can use the tools and
technologies designed for XML documents.
As a simple example, suppose you are writing an XML editor and you want to
use DTDs to control user input -- for example, if somebody is editing a
memo that conforms to the above DTD, you want to be sure that the Memo
element contains Paragraph elements but not other Memo elements. Because
most XML parsers do not return DTD information to the application, you
would need to write your own DTD parser. However, if your document schemas
were defined using a schema language instead of DTDs, you could parse the
schema documents using any available XML parser.
There are currently four proposed schema languages:
All of these languages are very similar at a base level -- defining
elements and attributes and so on. They differ to some extent in the degree
to which they replace DTDs; for example, some can define entities and some
can't. They differ radically in the other capabilities they offer:
XML-Data is the most ambitious and XSchema is the simplest. Eventually,
all of these languages will be replaced by one currently being defined by
Since you are just starting out with XML, you might not need to worry about
schema languages. If you are still interested, I suggest starting with
XSchema, as I think it is the simplest (disclaimer: I am one of the authors
and admittedly biased). A couple of other things to consider:
(a) XML-Data is (I believe) no longer being worked on, but is used by the
Microsoft parser as a way to expose DTD information.
(b) You will probably want to convert any code you write to the W3C's
schema language when it is published, so it might be safest to stick with
-- Ron Bourret
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev