SAX: Next Round
John Cowan
cowan at locke.ccil.org
Wed Jan 20 22:37:18 GMT 1999
David Megginson scripsit:
> I'd like to lose EntityResolver and DTDHandler (who uses them?), but I
> don't know if we can.
Nope, nope, nope. In particular, I still have a project to finish
a standard EntityResolver that understands Socats. By having such
a thing, you can fit Socat support into arbitrary applications using
arbitrary SAX parsers. Keep it. As for DTDHandler, it exposes
stuff that XML 1.0 requires a parser to expose.
> 1. Filter Interface
I propose a fourth alternative: provide ParserFilter as a helper
class, and don't have a separate interface. Parser filters are
just parsers that have a "parser(Parser)" constructor.
One particularly nice feature of this is that it is the pattern
used by Java {Input,Output}Streams and Readers/Writers: Chain of
Responsibility.
> 2. Lexical Event Handler
I'll post on this later.
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan at ccil.org
You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn.
You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn.
Clear all so! 'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev
mailing list