Next Round

[John Cowan]

Rob Schoening wrote:

> If the mix and match approach is to be successful, I believe that it should
> be hidden for ordinary use through some kind of aggregation.  This would
> necessitate either 1) multiple inheritance of interfaces

Which Java has, fortunately.

> or 2) language
> specific  abstract classes.

"Language-specific" in the sense that they have to actually be
implemented in each language.  The org.xml.sax.helpers package
already contains several such classes.

-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan at ccil.org
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)