Next Round

[david at megginson.com]

John Cowan writes:

 > This is already true of the SAX attribute map, as the SAX
 > documentation warns; in fact, parsers are free to reuse the same
 > object for *every* attribute map.

In most cases, they probably _should_ do that to avoid unnecessary
allocation.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david at megginson.com
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)