Why informal specs usually win
paul at prescod.net
Sun Jan 24 17:41:09 GMT 1999
david at megginson.com wrote:
> Informal specs fit into the Worse-is-Better pattern : a less formal
> spec that many people can understand easily will generally be adopted
> and implemented much more successfully than a more formal spec that
> fewer people can understand, despite the disadvantage that the less
> formal spec probably contains ambiguities, inconsistencies and
This is all true, but it isn't complete:
formal + hard-to-understand = low adoption, few bugs
informal + easy-to-understand = high adoption, many bugs
formal + easy-to-understand?
Let's not forget that formalisms are educational tools. They help us to
understand things. Nobody argues that XML should throw out its BNF or that
XML-based languages should throw away their DTDs (or other schemas). In
other words, formalisms help you to understand *if you know the
formalism*. Prose would be easier to understand than BNF for someone who
didn't know BNF, at first, but over the long term, it would be harder to
This implies that the responsibility of the W3C is not to avoid formality,
but to educate people on a few, well-designed, easy-to-learn formalisms
which can serve to increase understanding. In other words, this is one of
those short-term/long-term decisions that drive everything.
Paul Prescod - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself
"You have the wrong number."
"Eh? Isn't that the Odeon?"
"No, this is the Great Theater of Life. Admission is free, but the
taxation is mortal. You come when you can, and leave when you must. The
show is continuous. Good-night." -- Robertson Davies, "The Cunning Man"
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev