Question on ANY (its use in RDF)
Daniel.Brickley at bristol.ac.uk
Mon Jan 25 15:50:36 GMT 1999
On Mon, 25 Jan 1999, Chris Maden wrote:
> [Marcus Carr]
> > Roger L. Costello wrote:
> > > I have a question about the ANY type. It is my understanding that
> > > an element defined to be of type ANY can contain any element that
> > > is defined *within* the DTD (i.e., it cannot use elements that are
> > > not defined in the DTD). Correct?
> > My advice to anyone is never accept a DTD that uses ANY. The only
> > legimate use I have ever seen for it is in an interim DTD during
> > data conversion. It's a sloppy use of a sloppy mechanism - for
> > example, would you really want to support an infinite number of
> > nested rdf:Description elements? There is no preventing this - even
> > the DOCTYPE element can be nested within itself.
> However, remember that a document type is composed of its formal
> specification *and* its prose specification. Moreover, RDF is
> explicitly intended for use with namespaces. The RDF DTD expresses
> constraints among RDF elements; using ANY in the content model of its
> root was a good idea, just like HyTime uses ANY for most of its
> content models. Though I don't think the spec explicitly says so, RDF
> is more akin to an architecture than to a document type, but without
> the ability to rename element types.
This is probably true, but there is no 'RDF DTD' as such. The rdf.dtd
thing is I believe something experimental found on IBM's Alphaworks site
and not from the RDF Model and Syntax spec.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev