Word and XML (was: XML standards coherency and so forth)
whisper at accessone.com
Mon Jan 25 17:32:10 GMT 1999
It's that the generations are so damned fast is a big part of the problem
Quality of thought and implementation have given way to the product and
"mind share" cycles of Madison Ave (i.e. the marketers).
What's the incentive to make net stuff conforming? The bits get moved no
matter what the form and it's the receivers that have to adapt (read:
kludge) their software to cope with the semi-sortof markup they get.
At 01:39 PM 1/21/99 -0600, Robin Cover wrote:
>Come to think of it: why should this be "Un*censored*believable"
>given that 99% of Net stuff is illegal HTML, despite a couple
>generations (years) of HTML DTDs?
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev