Will XML eat the web?
paul at prescod.net
Thu Jan 28 22:13:47 GMT 1999
Pavel Velikhov wrote:
> Paul Prescod wrote:
> > You need to store data that is efficiently maintained relationally. You
> > need to *transmit* XML. Why not use a relational database and create XML
> > when you need it.
> Transmitting XML in a textual representation is not always a good idea.
I don't follow you. XML is, by definition, textual.
> When the user does the 'select *' query on an XML database, sending him
> a 20 megabyte XML file that he will need to parse, apply an xsl
> to and display in the browser is not the best solution. IMHO, the result
> of the query should be shipped on demand, when the user is actually
> at a piece of an XML file.
I don't think I said anything to contradict this, though I would say that
by the time you have a "20 megabyte XML file" you've probably already done
something wrong. There is almost never a good reason to generate files
Paul Prescod - ISOGEN Consulting Engineer speaking for only himself
Don't you know that the smart bombs are so clever, they only kill
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev