Another errata?

[Andrew Layman]

Speaking of the idea that unqualified attributes do not  have an association
with a 'default' namespace, John Cowan  wrote "This distinction was
introduced into xml-names between the August and September working drafts."
That is correct.  To be absolutely precise, the technical distinction was
recognized by members of the WG substantially before September, but it took
until the September draft to get agreement that the current wording best
expressed the preferred relationahip.

--Andrew

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)