URNs and SPAM

[John Cowan]

Paul Prescod wrote:

>  1. don't worry about it. We'll have other URN mechanisms soon and today's
> harvesters won't recognize urn:urn-22:foo at bar.com:blah anyhow.

I suspect this is false, and that harvesters will recognize
"foo at bar.com" embedded in any text.

> I am leaning toward option 2.

I like option 2 also.

"I do not like this URNish spam!  I do not like it, Sam-I-am!"

"There was only one URN -- but that was URN-22."

-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan at ccil.org
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)