DTD confusion (was Re: Lotsa laughs)
chris at w3.org
Sat Jun 5 22:57:19 BST 1999
David Megginson wrote:
> David LeBlanc writes:
> (on DTDs)
> > Ok, now i'm confused David - your second statement seems to
> > contradict your first statement.
> If you give me a single, well-formed XML document, I can *always*
> write a DTD that describes its structure.
Yes. You declare each observed element, give it a content model of any,
declare each observed attribute, and make it PCDATA.
That minimally describes it, like an RFC 822 email message can be
describes as "a sequence of characters"; and likewise, it doesn't
necessarily fully describe it or capture all the constraints that would
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev