Confusion while implementing the DOM

[Miles Sabin]

Don Park wrote,
> Miles Sabin wrote,
> > No mistake. A DocumentFragment *is* a Node. But if you
> > try and insert it into the tree, you'll find that a
> > conforming implementation will throw a 
> > HIERARCHY_REQUEST_ERR.
>
> Actually, inserting a DocumentFragment 'node' into a 
> tree should insert the child nodes of the 
> DocumentFragment (leaving it empty).

Oops ...

I *think* that what I was trying to say was ... exactly
what you just said. Or maybe I temporarily took leave of 
my senses ;-)

Cheers,


Miles

-- 
Miles Sabin                          Cromwell Media
Internet Systems Architect           5/6 Glenthorne Mews
+44 (0)181 410 2230                  London, W6 0LJ
msabin at cromwellmedia.co.uk           England



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)