Web Resource Identity

[David Brownell]

Paul Prescod wrote:
> 
> Jerome McDonough wrote:
> >
> >Two different
> > URNs may refer to the same abstract work, and retrieve the same or different
> > physical manifestations depending on the work identified, context of the
> > resolver,
> > etc.  When you have two URNs identifying an abstract concept, I don't see
> > how you can reliably determine computationally that they both identify the
> > same thing.
> 
> Why can't you just ask the server? "I've got these two URNs. What's the
> Unique ID of the thing that they refer to?"

You're assuming there's a workable notion of extrinsic identity,
which has never been achieved (for all that the notion appears to
be simple and desirable).  There are too many nuances to "identity".

Tossing another monkey wrench in the soup ... what about agents
on the network who are trying to deceive you to make you act in
some particular way?  The web clearly has such agents.  What's
the consequence of asking such a question of such an agent, and
acting on its incorrect answer?  (Or acting on such an incorrect
answer even in the face of an honest human mistake, or some sort
of system fault?)

- Dave

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)