XSL Debate, Leventhal responds to Stephen Deach
david-b at pacbell.net
Wed Jun 23 15:41:03 BST 1999
"Simon St.Laurent" wrote:
> First, we're not even talking about 'vanilla XML' here - we're talking
> primarily about XSL FOs. Technically, it's XML, but it's scrubbed down to
> be without semantic content in the markup.
Or rather, the semantics in the markup relate only to presentation.
> If companies are concerned about information reuse, they should look into
> other mechanisms for limiting redistribution, including the simple step of
> putting a group of copyright lawyers on retainer. There are other ways to
> solve these problems that don't involve keeping the Web as dumb as possible.
Even for large organizations which can afford a fleet of lawyers,
it's a lot more cost-effective to avoid creating the problem in
the first place. If the first lawyer you talk to doesn't point
that out, you'd need to replace him/her ...
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev