Announcement: SAX2 1999-06-01 alpha release for Java

[John Cowan]

David Brownell wrote:

> DocumentSource??  Not a SAX class ... :-)
> 
> If you mean InputSource, the issue I'd raise there is that
> it'd imply that all SAX parsers should be able to accept DOM
> as input.

InputSource, of course.  And I was talking about an extension
(subclass) of InputSource specific to DOM parsing, not changing
(extending) InputSource.  Sorry for the confusion.

Another option is to change InputSource to support a single
additional pair of methods: get/setSourceObject(Object o).
The meaning of this would be specific to the particular parser
and the run-time type of o.
 
> Why do you not like making that property (dom-node) be read/write,

Essentially because the value of getProperty("dom-node") is a Node,
whereas the argument to setProperty("dom-node", doc) needs to be a
Document.  This is an ugly asymmetry, even though the compiler is
unable to check the type.  Adding a new property
("dom-document") would be better, but not better than overloading
InputSource, which is already meant for the job of specifying
the source.

> beyond that not being what you implemented already?

(heh heh)

-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan at ccil.org
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)