parsers for Palm?

[Tim Bray]

At 04:27 PM 6/28/99 -0700, David Brownell wrote:
>> Distinguish between <!DOCTYPE > and validation.  I do *not* agree
>> that parsing DTD syntax takes up 2/3 of a parser.
>
>I did distinguish between them. 
...
>Savings may not be 2/3 ... but I'd be _really_ surprised if they were
>less than 1/2.  The best way to know is to implement ... :-)

I did.

>But they can become a LOT
>smaller if they don't need to handle even that, and are relieved of
>the responsibilities to handle the syntax and state in a DOCTYPE.

I disagree.  We went through this quite a bit in the XML Syntax Working 
Group.  It is absolutely *not* the case that DTD parsing is demonstrably
very expensive.  There was a conventional wisdom floating about that
a parser for a DTD-free dialect of XML could deliver the same performance
and functionality in immensely less space.  Empirical analysis fails 
to support this contention.  Analysis of existing parsers shows immense 
amounts of work going into things like reading Unicode efficiently, doing 
well-formedness checks on entity nesting, and tracking locations to
support good error messages - I repeat that there is a resounding lack
of evidence to show that parsing DTD syntax is particularly taxing for
any competent programmer.  Even parameter entities aren't hard to
implement - they are hard to *describe*, just not hard to implement. -Tim

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)