XML MULTI-Fragment Interchange?
donpark at quake.net
Fri Mar 5 00:37:58 GMT 1999
>First, let me remind folks that only comments sent to the archived
>mail list set up for comments are "officially" considered. The WG
>cannot promise to honor all requests for responses to questions posted
Sorry about that. I couldn't find the e-mail address of the mailing list
(W3C site was down) when I sent my message so had to punt into xml-dev.
>Of course, if you seriously believe that the spec is useless unless it
>allows multiple fragment bodies per package, then that is a comment you
>should make and attempt to support. We don't want to come out with a
>spec folks think is useless, but we were trying to keep it as minimal
>as possible while still addressing the problem we defined as our scope.
I found the spec very useful, timely, and clear. It was not my intention to
delay, divert, or hamper the progress of the XML Fragment spec. It was also
not my intention to imply that the WG overlooked something important.
I withdraw my comment since it does not fall under the intended scope of the
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev